This invention relates to certain polyoxymethylene blends comprised of a polyoxy ethylene component, a thermoplastic elastomer component, and an amorphous thermoplastic polymer component that are stabilized with a certain polymer stabilizer that is non-meltable and that contains formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups. The blends stabilized with the polymer stabilizer described herein are characterized as having excellent melt processing stability and a good overall balance of physical properties.

Polyoxymethylene compositions (also referred to in the art as "polyacetal" compositions) are generally understood to include compositions based on homopolymers of formaldehyde or of cyclic oligomers of formaldehyde, for example trioxane, the terminal groups of which are end-capped by esterification or etherification, as well as copolymerε of formaldehyde or of cyclic oligomers of formaldehyde, with oxyalkylene groups with at least two adjacent carbon atoms in the main chain, the terminal groups of which copoly ers can be hydroxyl terminated or can be end-capped by esterification or etherification. The proportion of the comonomers can be up to 20 weight percent. Compositions based on POM of relatively high molecular weight, i.e., 20,000 to 100,000 are useful in preparing semi-finished and finished articles b any of the techniques commonly used with thermoplastic materials, e.g., compression molding, injection molding, extrusion, blow molding, melt spinning.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

stamping and thermoforming. Finished products made from such polyoxymethylene compositions possess extremely desirable physical properties, including high stiffness, strength, and solvent resistance. Polyoxymethylene compositions containing thermoplastic polyurethanes have been recently developed and said compositions possess extraordinary toughness and/or impact resistance, along with also possessing a good overall balance of physical properties, βuch as etiffneeβ and elongation. It was also recently discovered that the degree of mold shrinkage experienced by these polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane compositions could be significantly reduced by blending the polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane composition with at least one amorphous thermoplastic polymer.

With the development of new polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane/amorphous ^' thermoplastic polymer blends, there became a need to find a stabilizer to protect the blends against degradation during melt processing. For the stabilizer to be effective, it would have to act as a stabilizer for not only the polyoxymethylene component of the blend but also for the other components of the blend. It thus was not known if conventional polyoxymethylene thermal stabilizers, such as, for example, nylon, would stabilize ^" the blends against degradation during melt processing. it was surprisingly found that a polymer stabilizer that is non-meltable, has a number average particle size in the blend of 10 microns or less, and that contains formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups, as described in.further detail below, not only was effective as a melt processing stabilizer for the

blends but also that it Imparted superior melt processing stability, on average, to the polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane/ morphous thermoplastic polymer blends. This result was surprising in part because experimental data, as disclosed herein, showed no significant difference in melt processing stability between ^■ polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane compositions containing the polymer stabilizer described herein and polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane compositions containing the more conventional polyoxymethylene stabilizers, such as nylon and ethylene vinyl alcohol. Thus, the fact that the polymer stabilizer described herein improved the melt processing stability of the polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane/amorphous thermoplastic polymer blends to a significantly greater degree than did the more conventional polyoxymethylene stabilizers was not only unexpected but was also quite surprising.

It was further surprisingly found that even better melt processing stability could be attained if the stabilizer incorporated into the polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane/amorphous thermoplastic polymer blend was a mixture of the polymer stabilizer, as described below, and a co-stabilizer selected from conventional meltable nylon (or polya ide) based stabilizers, meltable hydroxy containing oligomers or polymers, such as ethylene vinyl alcohol, or microcrystalline cellulose. The melt processing stability of the blends containing such a mixed stabilizer system was better than the melt processing stability of the same blend containing only the polymer stabilizer, described below, or the co-εtabilizer.

TUTE SHEET

The polyoxymethylene blends of the present invention are useful as injection molding resins in applications where the properties of a polyoxymethylene or polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane ^• composition are desired and where enhanced melt processing stability is required. Background Art

Polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane compositions are described in commonly assigned European Patent No. 0117664 and U.S. Patent 4,804,716.

Polyoxymethylene compositions stabilized with examples of nylon-type stabilizers are disclosed in U.S. patent 4,640,949; U.S. patent 3,960,984; and U.S. patent 4,098,843. In U.S. patent 4,640,949, polyoxymethylene compositions are stabilized with a blend comprised of a thermoplastic polyurethane with a polyamide dispersed therein as a separate phase. In U.S. patent 3,960,984, polyoxymethylene compositions are stabilized with dicapped amide oligomers having a molecular weight of 800 to 10,000. In U.S. patent 4,098,843, polyoxymethylene compositions are stabilized with a dispersion of a polyamide in a carrier resin. In each of these patents, control examples are provided wherein other types of polyamide stabilizers are incorporated into polyoxymethylene. Conventional polyamide stabilizers for polyoxymethylene are also described in Alsup et al., U.S. patent 2,993,025.

Hydroxy-containing polymers and oligomers useful as stabilizers in polyoxymethylene are disclosed in U.S. patent 4,766,168.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In the present invention, it was found that the melt processing stability of a

TITUTE SHEET

polyoxymethylene/thermoplastic polyurethane/amorphous thermoplastic polymer blend could be significantly improved by the incorporation therein of 0.05 to 3.0 weight percent, based upon the weight of the blend, of a polymer stabilizer that is non-meltable, has a number average particle size in the blend of less than ten microns, and contains formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups wherein the amount of formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups present as or part of the side chains of the backbone of the polymer stabilizer is at least three times greater than the amount of formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups, if any, present in the backbone of the polymer stabilizer. The melt processing stability of said blends is improved even further* by the incorporation therein of a 0.01 to 1.00 weight percent, based upon the weight of the blend, of a co-stabilizer, said co-stabilizer being selected from meltable polya ide-based stabilizers, meltable hydroxy-containing polymer or oligomer stabilizers, and microcrystalline cellulose. The stabilized blends are useful as injection molding resins where the properties of a polyoxymethylene are desired and where enhanced thermal stability is required.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to certain polyoxymethylene blends characterized by improved melt processing stability. Specifically, the polyoxymethylene blends consist essentially of (a) a polyoxymethylene component, (b) a thermoplastic polyurethane component, (c) an amorphous thermoplastic polymer component, and (d) a polymer stabilizer component.. ^* The melt processing stability of said blends is even further improved by the inclusion therein of a specific co-stabilizer component (e) . The co-stabilizer component (e) is selected from

ITUTE SHEET

conventional meltable nylon-based stabilizers, meltable hydroxy-containing polymer and oligomer stabilizers, and microcrystalline cellulose stabilizers. Each component of the blends of the present invention is described below.

PLEND ςoHPQNEt-rrg Component fa) Polyoxymethylene The component (a) "polyoxymethylene" includes homopolymers of formaldehyde or of cyclic oligomers of formaldehyde, the terminal groups of which are end-capped by esterification or etherification, and copolymers of formaldehyde or of cyclic oligomers of formaldehyde and other monomers that yield oxyalkylene groups with at least two adjacent carbon atoms in the main chain, the terminal groups of which copolymers can be hydroxyl terminated or can be end-capped by esterification or etherification.

The polyoxymethylenes used in the blends of the present invention can be branched or linear and will generally have a number average molecular weight in the range of 10,000 to 100,000, preferably 20,000 to 90,000, and more preferably 25,000 to 70,000. The molecular weight can be conveniently measured by gel permeation chromatography in jn-cresol at 160*C using a Du Pont PSM bimodal column kit with nominal pore size of 60 and 1000 A. Although polyoxymethylenes having higher or lower molecular weight averages can be used, depending on the physical and processing properties desired, the polyoxymethylene molecular weight averages mentioned above are preferred to provide optimum balance of good mixing of the various ingredients to be melt blended into the polyoxymethylene blend with the most desired

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

combination of physical properties in the molded articles made from such blends.

As an alternative to characterizing the polyoxymethylene by its number average molecular weight, it can be characterized by its melt flow rate. Polyoxymethylenes which are suitable for use in the blends of the present invention will have a melt flow rate (measured according to ASTM-D-1238, Procedure A, Condition G with a 1.0 mm (0.0413 inch) diameter orifice of 0.1-40 grams/10 minutes. Preferably, the melt flow rate of the polyoxymethylene used in the blends of the present invention will be from 0.5-35 grams/10 minutes. The most preferred polyoxymethylenes are linear polyoxymethylenes with a melt flow rate of about 1-20 gram/10 minutes.

As indicated above, the polyoxymethylene can be either a ho opolymer, a copolymer, or a mixture thereof. Copolymers can contain one or more comonomers, such as those generally used in preparing polyoxymethylene compositions. Comonomers more commonly used include alkylene oxides of 2-12 carbon atoms and their cyclic addition products with formaldehyde. The quantity of comonomer will not be more than 20 weight percent, preferably hot more than 15 weight percent, and most preferably about 2 weight percent. The most preferred comonomer is ethylene oxide. Generally polyoxymethylene homopolymer is preferred over copolymer because of its greater stiffness and strength. Preferred polyoxymethylene homopolymers include those whose terminal hydroxy1 groups have been end-capped by a chemical reaction to form ester or ether groups, preferably acetate or methoxy groups, respectively.

It is understood that the polyoxymethylene may also contain those additives, ingredients, and

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

s modifiers that are known to be added to polyoxymethylene.

Component fbi Thermoplastic Polyurethane The component (b) "thermoplastic polyurethanes" suited for use in the blends of the present invention can be selected from those commercially available or can be made by processes known in the art. (See, for example. Rubber Technology, 2nd edition, edited by Maurice Morton (1973), Chapter 17, Urethane Elastomers, D. A. Meyer, especially pp. 453-6) . Thermoplastic polyurethanes are derived from the reaction of polyester or polyether polyols with diisocyanates and optionally also from the further reaction of such components with chain-extending agents such as low molecular weight polyols, preferably diols, or with diamines to form urea linkages. Thermoplastic polyurethanes are generally composed of soft segments, for example polyether or polyester polyols, and hard segments, usually derived from the reaction of -the low molecular weight diols and diisocyanates. While a thermoplastic polyurethane with no hard segments can be used, those most useful will contain both soft and hard segments. In the preparation of the thermoplastic polyurethanes useful in the blends of the present invention, a polymeric soft segment material having at least about 500 and preferably from about 550 to about 5,000 and most preferably from about 1,000 to about 3,000, such as a dihydric polyester or a polyalkylene ether diol, is reacted with an organic diisocyanate in a ratio such that a substantially linear polyurethane polymer results, although some branching can be present. A diol chain extender having a molecular weight.less than about 250 may also be incorporated. The mole ratio of isocyanate to hydroxyl in the

polymer is preferably from about 0.95 to 1.08 more preferably 0.95 to 1.05, and most preferably, 0.95 to 1.00. In addition, monofunctional isocyanates or alcohols can be used to control molecular weight of the polyurethane.

Suitable polyester polyols include the polyesterification products of one or more dihydric alcohols with one or more dicarboxylic acids. Suitable polyester polyols also include polycarbonate polyolβ. Suitable dicarboxylic acids include adipic acid, εuccinic acid, sebacic acid, suberic acid, methyladipic acid, glutaric acid, pimelic acid, azelaic acid, thiodipropionic acid and citraconic acid and mixtures thereof, including small amounts of aromatic dicarboxylic acids. Suitable dihydric alcohols include ethylene glycol, 1,3- or 1,2-propylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 2-methylpentanediol-l,5, diethylene glycol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,5-hexanediol, 1,2-dodecanediol, and mixtures thereof.

Further, hydroxyσarboxylic acids, lactones, and cyclic carbonates, such as £ ^" -caprolactone and 3-hydroxybutyric acid can be used in the preparation of the polyester. Preferred polyesters include poly(ethylene adipate) , poly(1,4-butylene adipate) , mixtures of these adipates, and poly^ caprolactone.

Suitable polyether polyols include the condensation products of one or more alkylene oxides with a small amount of one or more compounds having active hydrogen containing groups, such as water, ethylene glycol, 1,2- or 1,3-propylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol and 1,5-pentanediol and mixtures, thereof. Suitable alkylene oxide condensates include those of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and butylene

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

oxide and mixtures thereof. Suitable polyalkylene ether glycols may also be prepared from tetrahydrofuran. In addition, suitable polyether polyols can contain comonomers, especially as random or block comonomers, ether glycols derived from ethylene oxide, 1,2-propylene oxide and/or tetrahydrofuran (THF) . Alternatively, a THF polyether copolymer with minor amounts of 3-methyl THF can also be used. Preferred polyetherε include poly(tetramethylene ether) glycol (PTMEG) , poly(propylene oxide) glycol, and copolymers of propylene oxide and ethylene oxide, and copolymers of tetrahydrofuran and ethylene oxide. Other suitable polymeric diols include those which are primarily hydrocarbon in nature, e.g., polybutadiene diol.

Suitable organic diisocyanates include

1,4-butylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, cyclopentylene-l,3-diisocyanate, 4,4'-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, cyclohexylene-l,4-diisocyanate,

2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, isomeric mixtures of 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, 4,4'-methylene bis(phenyliεocyanate) , 2,2-diphenylpropane-4,4 ^, -diiεocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, m-phenylene diisocyanate, xylene diisocyanate, 1,4-naphthylene diisocyanate,

1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-diphenyl diisocyanate, azobenzene-4,4'-diisocyanate, m- or p-tetramethylxylene diisocyanate, and l-chlorobenzene-2,4-diisocyanate. 4,4'-Methylene bis(phenylisocyanate) , 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate and 2,4-toluene diisocyanate are preferred.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Secondary amide linkages including those derived from adipyl chloride and piperazine, and secondary urethane linkages, including those derived from the biε-chloroformateε of PTMEG and/or butanediol, can also be present in the polyurethanes. Dihydric alcohols suitable for use as chain extending agentε in the preparation of the ther oplaεtic polyurethaneε include thoεe containing carbon chains which are either uninterrupted or which are interrupted by oxygen or sulfur linkages, including 1,2-ethanediol, 1,2-propanediol, isopropyl-a-glyceryl ether, 1,3-propanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 2,2-dimethyl-l,3-propanediol, 2,2-diethyl-l,3-propanediol, 2-ethyl.-2-butyl-l,3-propanediol, 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-l,3-pentanediol, 2-ethyl-l,3-hexanediol, 1,4-butanediol,. 2,5-hexanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, dihydroxycyclopentane, 1,6-hexanediol,

1, -cyclohexanediol, 4,4'-cyclohexanedimethylol, thiodiglycol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, 2-methyl-l,3-propanediol, 2-methyl-2-ethyl-l,3-propanediol, dihydroxyethyl ether of hydroquinone, hydrogenated biεphenol A, dihydroxyethyl terephthalate and dihydroxymethyl benzene and mixtures thereof. Hydroxyl terminated oligomers of 1,4-butanediol terephthalate can also be used, giving a polyester-urethane-polyester repeating structure. Diamines can also be used as chain extending agents giving urea linkages. 1,4-Butanediol, 1,2-ethanediol and 1,6-hexanediol are preferred.

In the preparation of the thermoplastic polyurethanes, the ratio of iεocyanate to hydroxyl

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

should be close to unity, and the reaction can be a one step or a two step reaction. Catalyst can be used, and the reaction can be run neat or in a solvent. The moisture content of the blend, in particular of the thermoplastic polyurethane, can influence the results achieved. Water is known to react with polyurethaneε, causing the polyurethane to degrade, thereby lowering the effective molecular weight of the polyurethane and lowering the inherent and melt viscosity of the polyurethane. Accordingly, the drier the better. In any event, the moisture content of the blend, and of the individual components of the blend, should contain less than 0.2 percent by weight of water, preferably less than 0.1 percent, especially when there is no opportunity for the water to escape, for example during an injection molding process and other techniques of melt processing. The thermoplastic polyurethane can also contain those additives, ingredients, and modifierε known to be added to thermoplaεtic polyurethane.

Component (c) Amorphous Thermoplastic Polymer Component (c) is at least one amorphous thermoplastic polymer. These amorphous thermoplaεtic polymerε are thermoplastic polymerε that are generally used by themselves in extrusion and injection molding procesεeε. These polymers are known to those skilled in the art as extrusion and injection molding grade resins, as opposed to those resinε that are known for use aε minor componentε (i.e., proceεεing aids, impact modifiers, εtabilizerε) in polymer compoεitionε.

By the term ^• *amorphouε ^,, , it iε meant that the polymer haε no diεtinct cryεtalline melting point, nor doeε it have a measurable heat of fusion (although with very slow cooling from the melt, or with of

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

εufficient annealing, εome cryεtallinity may develop) . The heat of fusion is conveniently determined on a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) . A suitable calorimeter is the Du Pont Company's 990 thermal analyzer. Part Number 990000 with cell base II, Part Number 990315 and DSC cell. Part Number 900600. With this instrument, heat of fusion can be measured at a heating rate of 20*C per minute. The sample is alternately heated to a temperature above the anticipated melting point and cooled rapidly by cooling the sample jacket with liquid nitrogen. The heat of fuεion iε determined on any heating cycle after the first and εhould be a constant value within experimental error. Amorphous polymerε are defined herein as having a heat of fuεion, by thiε method, of less than 1 cal/gram. For reference, εemicryεtalline 66 nylon polyamide with a molecular weight of about 17,000 haε a heat of fusion of about 16 cal/gm.

By the term "thermoplastic" it is meant that the polymer softens, when heated, to a flowable state in which under presεure it can be forced or tranεferred from a heated cavity into a cool mold and upon cooling in the mold, it hardenε and takes the εhape of the mold. Thermoplaεtic polymerε are defined in thiε manner in the Handbook of Plastics and Elastomers (published by McGraw-Hill) .

The amorphous thermoplastic polymers uεeful in the preεent blendε must be "melt processible" at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt proceεεed. Polyoxymethylene, and blendε thereof, iε normally melt processed at melt-temperatures of about 170-260'C, preferably 185-240*C, and most preferably 200-230'C. By "melt procesεible", it iε meant that the amorphous thermoplastic polymer must soften or have a sufficient flow such that it can be

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

melt compounded at the particular melt proceεsing temperature for the polyoxymethylene blend.

The minimum molecular weight of the amorphous thermoplaεtic polymer iε not considered to be significant for the present blends, provided that the polymer has a degree of polymerization of at least twenty and further provided that the polymer iε melt procesεible (i.e., it flowε under preεεure) at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene is melt processed. The maximum molecular weight of the amorphous thermoplaεtic polymer εhould not be εo high that the amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer by itεelf would not be injection oldable by standard preεent techniqueε. The maximum molecular weight for a polymer to be uεed for injection molding proceεεeε will vary with each individual, particular amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer. However, εaid maximum molecular weight for uεe in injection molding proceεεeε iε readily discernible by those skilled in the art. To realize optimum physical properties for the ternary blend, it is recommended that the polyoxymethylene polymer and the amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer have matching melt viεcoεity valueε under the same conditions of temperature and pressure.

The amorphous thermoplastic polymer can be incorporated into the blend as one amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer or aε a blend of more than one amorphous thermoplastic polymer. Preferably, component (c) consists of one.amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer. Whether it iε incorporated aε one amorphouε thermoplastic polymer or as a blend of more than one, the weight percent of all amorphous thermoplastic polymerε in the* composition shall not exceed the weight percent ranges given above.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Amorphous thermoplastic polymerε, which are injection molding and extrusion grade, εuited for uεe in the blends of the present invention are well known in the art and can be εelected from thoεe commercially available or can be made by proceεεeε known in the art. Exampleε of suitable amorphous thermoplastic polymers can be selected from the group consiεting of εtyrene acrylonitr.ile copolymerε (SAN) , SAN copolymers toughened with a moεtly unεaturated rubber, such as acrylonitrile-butadiene-εtyrene (ABS) resins, or toughened with a mostly saturated rubber, such aε acrylonitrile-ethylene-propylene-εtyrene resins (AES) , polycarbonates, polyamides, polyarylateε, polyphenyleneoκideε, polyphenylene etherε, high impact εtyrene reεihs (HIPS) , acrylic polymers, imidized acrylic resins, εtyrene maleic anhydride copolymers, polysulfoneε, εtyrene acrylonitrile maleic anhydride resins, and εtyrene acrylic copolymerε, and derivativeε thereof. The preferred amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymerε are εelected from the group conεiεting of εtyrene acrylonitrile copolymerε (SAN) , SAN copolymers toughened with a. mostly unsaturated rubber, such as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) reεinε, or toughened with a moεtly εaturated rubber, εuch aε acrylonitrile-ethylene-propylene-εtyrene reεins (AES) , polycarbonates, and derivatives thereof. Most preferred amorphous thermoplastic polymerε are SAN copolymers, ABS resins, AES resins, and polycarbonates.

The amorphous thermoplastic polymers discloεed above are all .known in the art and can be prepared by techniques readily available to those skilled in the art. Further description of εaid polymers is provided below.

EET

Amorphous thermoplastic SAN copolymers that are useful herein are well known in the art. SAN copolymer is generally a random, amorphouε, linear copolymer produced by copolymerizing εtyrene and acrylonitrile. The preferred SAN copolymer has a minimum molecular weight of 10,000 and consiεtε of 20-40% acrylonitrile, 60-80% εtyrene. The more preferred SAN copolymer conεists of 25-35% acrylonitrile, 65-75% εtyrene. SAN copolymer iε commercially available or it can be readily prepared by techniqueε well known to thoεe εkilled in the art. Amorphouε thermoplaεtic SAN copolymerε are further deεcribed on pages.214-216 in Engineering Plastics, volume 2, published by ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metalε Park, Ohio (1988).

Amorphouε therrooplaεtic ABS and AES resins, which are injection molding and extrusion grade resinε, that are uεeful herein are well known in the art. ABS reεin iε produced by polymerizing acrylonitrile and εtyrene in the presence of butadiene, or a mostly butadiene, rubber. Preferably, the ABS resin iε co priεed of 50-95% of a matrix of SAN, with εaid matrix being comprised of 20-40% acrylonitrile and 60-80% styrene, and 5-50% of a butadiene rubber or a moεtly butadiene rubber, εuch as styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) . More preferably, it is comprised of 60-90% of a matrix of SAN, with said matrix more preferably being comprised of 25-35% acrylonitrile and 65-75% εtyrene, and 10-40% of a butadiene rubber. AES reεin iε produced by polymerizing acrylonitrile and εtyrene in the presence of a mostly saturated rubber. The preferred and more preferred AES reεin is the same aε the preferred and more preferred ABS resin except that the rubber component is compriεed of mostly ethylene-propylene

_• UBSTITUTE SHEET

copolymer, as oppoεed to butadiene, or mostly butadiene, rubber. Other alpha-olefinε and unsaturated moietieε may be present in the ethylene-propylene copolymer rubber. Both ABS and AES copolymerε are commercially available or can be readily prepared by techniqueε well known to thoεe εkilled in the art. Amorphous thermoplastic ABS reεin iε further deεcribed on pageε 109-114 in Engineering Plaεticε, referenced above.

Amorphous thermoplastic polycarbonates that are useful herein are well known in the art and can be most basically defined as posεeεεing the repetitive carbonate group

O

II

-O-C-O- and in addition will alwayε have the

phenylene moiety attached to the carbonate group (cf. U.S. Pat. No. 3,070,563).

Preferably, the polycarbonate can be characterized as possessing recurring structural units of the formula

wherein Z is a single bond, an alkylene or alkylidene moiety with 1-7 carbon atoms, a cycloalkylene or

T

cycloalkylidene moiety with 5-12 carbon atoms, -0-, -S-, -CO-, -so- or -SO2-, preferably methylene or isopropylidene; Ri and 2 are a hydrogen, a halogen, or an alkylene or alkylidene moiety having 1-7 carbon atomε, and n equals 0 to 4.

Amorphouε thermoplaεtic polycarbonateε are commercially available or can be readily prepared by techniques well known to those skilled in the ^" art. The most preferred aromatic polycarbonate on the basis of commercial availability and available technical information is the polycarbonate of bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,2-propane, known aε biεphenol-A polycarbonate. Amorphouε thermoplaεtic polycarbonate iε further described on pages 149-150 of Engineering Plastics, referenced above.

The amorphous thermoplastic polyamide polymers useful herein are described in U.S. patent 4,410,661, incorporated herein by reference.

The amorphous thermoplaεtic polyarylate polymerε useful herein are deεcribed in U.S. patent 4,861,828, incorporated herein by reference.

The amorphous thermoplaεtic polyphenylene etherε (PPE) and polyphenylene oxides (PPO) useful herein are known in the art. PPE homopolymer is frequently referred to as PPO. The chemical composition of the homopolymer is poly(2,6-dimethyl-4,4-phenylene ether) or poly(oxy-(2-6-dimethyl-4,4-phenylene) ) :

T

The chemical composition of PPE, which iε a copolymer, is as follows:

Both PPE and PPO are described on pages 183-185 in Engineering Plastics, referenced above.

The amorphous thermoplastic high impact εtyrene (HIPS) resins that are useful herein are produced by dissolving usually lesε than 20 percent polybutadiene rubber, or other rubber, in styrene monomer before initiating the polymerization reaction. Polystyrene forms the continuous phaεe of the polymer and the rubber phaεe exiεts as diεcrete particleε having occlusions of polystyrene. HIPS resin iε further described on pages 194-199 in Engineering Plastics, referenced above.

The amorphous thermoplaεtic acrylicε uεeful herein are those polymerε in which the major monomeric constituents belong to two families of ester-acrylateε and methacrylates. Amorphous thermoplaεtic acrylic polymerε are described on pages 103-108 in Engineering Plastics, referenced above. The molecular weight of the amorphous thermoplastic acrylic polymer, in order for it to be injection moldable by standard techniques, should not be greater than 200,000. The preferred amorphous thermoplastic acrylic resin iε polymethyl methacrylate.

The amorphous thermoplastic imidized acryiicε uεeful herein are diεclosed in U.S. patent

iUBSTlTUTE SHEET

4,246,374, incorporated herein by reference, and alεo in U.S. patent application εer. no. 06/476,092, which was allowed on May 26, 1989. .

The amorphouε εtyrene maleic anhydride copolymerε that are useful herein are produced by the reaction of εtyrene monomer with smaller amountε of maleic anhydride. The structure of styrene maleic anhydride is as follows:

Amorphous thermoplaεtic εtyrene maleic anhydride copolymerε are further deεcribed on pageε 217-221 in Engineering Plastics,, referenced above.

The amorphous thermoplastic polysulfones that are useful herein have the following structure:

It is produced fro bisphenol A and 4,4'-dichlorodiphenylεulfone by nucleophilic diεplacement che iεtry. It iε further deεcribed on pageε 200-202 in Engineering Plaεtjcε, referenced above.

^' .The amorphous*thermoplastic polymerε may alεo contain thoεe additional ingredientε, modifierε, εtabilizerε, and additiveε commonly included in εuch polymerε.

TITUTE SHEE

Component (ά) Polvmer Stabilizer The "polymer εtabilizer" used in the blends of the present invention is a homopolymer or copolymer containing "formaldehyde reactive" nitrogen groups, is "non-meltable" at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt processed, and has a number average particle size, before melt proσeεεing and thereafter, of less than ten microns.

By "formaldehyde reactive" it is meant that the nitrogen group contains a nitrogen with one or two hydrogen atoms bonded to it. Formaldehyde will react with the -NH bonds of the polymer stabilizer. These . reactive sites are referred to herein as formaldehyde reactive sites. It iε preferred that the polymer εtabilizer contain formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups having the maximum number of formaldehyde reactive sites. For example, a polymer εtabilizer containing formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε wherein there are two hydrogen atomε attached directly to the nitrogen atom (i.e., two formaldehyde reactive εiteε in the group) iε preferred over one containing formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε wherein there iε only one hydrogen atom attached directly to the nitrogen atom (i.e., one formaldehyde reactive site in the group) .

The polymer εtabilizer further has at leaεt ten repeat unitε. It preferably haε a weight average molecular weight of greater than 5,000, most preferably greater than 10,000. Higher weight average molecular weights are most preferred and further, εuch higher weight average molecular weightε may be advantageous for reducing mold deposit formation.

The polymer stabilizer iε "non-meltable" at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend iε melt processed. More specifically, by the term

_• T1TUTE SHEET

"non-meltable", it iε meant that the polymer εtabilizer has its "major melting,point" above the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt procesεed and thuε remainε eεεentially a εolid during melt proceεεing of the polyoxymethylene blend. Alternatively, the polymer εtabilizer iε "non-meltable" if the εtabilizer haε itε "major melting point" below the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt procesεed but it does not undergo significant melt flow at that temperature. The melt flow rate of the polymer εtabilizer may not be εignificant because the polymer εtabilizer haε a high viεcoεity, attributed to, for example, high molecular weight or crosslinking. In the case where the polymer εtabilizer haε itε "major melting point" below the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt procesεed, the melt flow rate of the polymer εtabilizer, as measured in accordance with ASTM-D 1238 (at 200*C under a load of 2.16 kg), is preferably less than one-tenth that of the polyoxymethylene in the blend. It iε recommended that for moεt accurate reεultε, the polymer εtabilizer be dried for 12 hourε at 90*C prior to meaεuring itε melt flow rate. The "major melting point" of the polymer εtabilizer can be determined on a differential scanning calorimeter, preferably on a DU PONT Model 9900 DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETER. A nitrogen atmoεphere εhould be used. To eliminate the possible effect of small amounts of moisture or solvent, it iε recommended that the polymer εtabilizer be firεt heated to 140 ^~ C and held there for 10 minuteε. The polymer εtabilizer sample εhould then be cooled to about 25*C and then heated at a rate of 20*C/minute up to 350*C. The temperature at which endothermε occurred

ITUTE SHEET

will be reported. Alεo reported will be the amount of heat absorbed, in Joules/gram, at each respective endotherm. "Major melting point" is the temperature at which the amount of heat absorbed, by the polymer stabilizer, iε greateεt (in Jouleε/gra ) ; i.e., it is the temperature at which the polymer εtabilizer shows the greatest endotherm.

The polyoxymethylene blends deεcribed herein are uεually melt processed at melt temperatureε of about 170-260-C, preferably 185-240*C, most preferably 200-230-C.

The polymer εtabilizer muεt alεo have a number average particle εize of leεε than 10 microns after melt processing in the blend. It further εhould have a number average particle εize of leεε than 10 microns before melt processing with the polyoxymethylene blend. It εhould be underεtood that a high degree of loose agglomeration of particleε in the polymer εtabilizer may occur during the preparation and iεolation of the polymer εtabilizer, such aε, for example, during the drying of the polymer εtabilizer. In order. for one to obtain a true and accurate meaεurement of the number average particle size, prior to melt processing, for a polymer εtabilizer containing a high degree of loose agglomerateε, the loose agglomerates εhould be broken up prior to measuring the number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer or, alternatively, they εhould be discounted in making εaid meaεureraent. Whether or not a polymer εtabilizer contains a high degree of loose agglomerateε can be determined by εtandard techniques of transmission electron microscopy. The details of determining the number average particle εize, both before and after melt proceεsing, are discloεed below.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

The formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups can be incorporated into the polymer stabilizer by using an appropriate nitrogen containing monomer, such aε, for example, acrylamide and methacrylamide. Preferred nitrogen containing onomerε are thoεe that reεult in the polymer εtabilizer containing formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε, wherein there are two hydrogen atomε attached to the nitrogen. The particularly preferred monomer iε acrylamide which, when polymerized, reεultε in a polymer εtabilizer having εubεtantially all of the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε attached directly aε a side chain of the polymer backbone or indirectly as a side chain of the polymer backbone. Alternatively, the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups can be generated on the polymer εtabilizer by modification of the polymer or copolymer. The formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε may be incorporated by either method aε long aε the reεultant polymer prepared therefrom iε non-meltable, or iε capable of being made non-meltable, at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend iε melt processed.

The quantity of the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups in the polymer stabilizer must be εuch that the atomε in the backbone to which the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε are attached, either directly or indirectly, are separated from each other (i.e., connected to each other) by not more than twenty chain atoms. Preferably, the polymer εtabilizer will contain at leaεt one formaldehyde reactive nitrogen group per each twenty carbon atomε in the backbone of the polymer. More preferably, the ratio of formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups to carbon atoms in the backbone will be 1:2-1:10, most preferably 1:2-1:5.

T TE SHEET

The formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups εhould be present in the polymer stabilizer εuch that the amount of the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε aε, or part of, the εide chains of the polymer εtabilizer backbone iε at leaεt 3 timeε, preferably at leaεt ten timeε, the amount of the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε, if any, preεent in the backbone of the polymer εtabilizer. In other words, the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups, attached directly or indirectly to the atomβ ih the b c bone of the εtabilizer polymer, εhould be at leaεt three times as great, preferably at least ten timeε aε great, aε thoεe in the backbone of the polymer εtabilizer, if such are present. The formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups attached directly or indirectly to the εide of the polymer backbone are preferably preεent in a εubstantially greater quantity than the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups, if any, present in the the polymer backbone. Most preferably, nearly one hundred percent of the formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groups are attached to the sideε of the polymer backbone.

The polymer εtabilizer can be a homopolymer or a copolymer, provided it iε non-meltable. It iε preferred that the polymer εtabilizer be polymerized from acrylamide or methacrylamide monomer by free radical polymerization and that the polymer stabilizer prepared therefrom consiεt of at leaεt 75 mole percent

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

of a unit of the form

R

I -(CH ₂ -C)-

I CNH ₂

II o

where R=hydrogen or methyl. More preferably, it conεiεtε of at leaεt 90 mole percent of the above unitε, even more preferably, it conεiεtε of at leaεt 95 mole percent of the above unitε, and moεt preferably, it conεiεtε of at leaεt 99 mole percent of the above unit.

The polymer εtabilizer may be a copolymer in that it iε polymerized from more than one monomer. The comonomer may or may not contain formaldehyde reactive nitrogen and/or formaldehyde reactive hydroxyl groups. Examples of other monomerε that may be thuε incorporated include εtyrene, ethylene, alkyl acrylateε, alkyl methacrylateε, N-vinylpyrrolidone, acrylonitrile, and ethylene vinyl alcohol. The polymer εtabilizer that iε a copolymer uεt still be non-meltable. It further muεt possess the required quantity of formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε, in the required ratio, and it muεt have the required number average particle εize. The comonomer preferably εhould be added εuch that it doeε not unduly minimize the number of moleε of formaldehyde reactive groupε per gram of polymer εtabilizer. Further, it εhould not unduly minimize the number of formaldehyde reactive εiteε per gram of polymer εtabilizer.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Specific preferred stabilizers that are copolymeric include copolymers of hydroxypropyl methacrylate with acrylamide, methacrylamide, or dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate. The polymer εtabilizer muεt have a number average particle εize of less than 10 microns, preferably lesε than 5 micronε, and moεt preferably leεs than 2 micronε, as measured before proceεεing in polyoxymethylene blend. Along with the polymer εtabilizer being non-meltable, the number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer iε important in achieving the improved stability for polyoxymethylene blend demonstrated herein. Stability iε related to the interaction that occurε between the polyoxymethylene blend componentε and the polymer εtabilizer and aε εuch, it iε deεirable to have good interaction between the polyoxymethylene and the polymer εtabilizer. Maximizing the surface area/gram of polymer stabilizer increases interaction between the polymer εtabilizer and the blend componentε. The εurface area/gram of polymer εtabilizer increases aε the particle size of the polymer εtabilizer decreases. Thus, a stabilizer with small particle εize is highly desired. If the polymer εtabilizer particle εize iε, on average, on the order of 10-100 micronε, then the polymer εtabilizer may impart stability to the polyoxymethylene blend but the physical properties of the articles manufactured from the polyoxymethylene blend may be reduced. Relatively large particles may also cause uneven εurface in the articleε manufactured from polyoxymethylene containing εtabilizer with large particles. In some cases, it may however be desirable to produce articles with εurfaceε having reduced εurface gloεs. In that case, a polymer stabilizer of

TITUTE SHEET

large particle εize, more near the upper limit of the number average particle εize, may actually be preferred.

The εmall number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer may be obtained directly during the polymerization of the monomer or comonomerε. To obtain the εmall average particle εize, the εtabilizer polymerization iε carried out by conventional diεperεion polymerization ethodε in an organic media or by conventional emulεion polymerization methods in water, the techniques of each of which are well known in the art. Whether the polymerization technique iε diεperεion polymerization or emulεion polymerization, the polymer εtabilizer prepared therefrom εhould be inεoluble in the polymerization media. Thuε, the particular media εelected for polymerization iε dependent upon the particular monomer or comonomerε chosen and the polymer that will reεult therefrom. For example, where acrylamide or methacrylamide iε a monomer for polymerization, the preferred media iε a lower alkyl alcohol. The polymerization may be by addition or condenεation polymerization or free radical polymerization. The moεt preferred method iε one that will reεult in the number of formaldehyde reactive εiteε in the formaldehyde reactive group being maximized. Generally, free radical polymerization iε the preferred method of polymerization. Polymer εtabilizer prepared from acrylamide iε most preferably prepared by free radical polymerization. In any event, the polymerization method must be εuch that it reεultε in a polymer εtabilizer having formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε in the quantitieε and amounts previouεly defined.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

In some cases, the polymer εtabilizer produced by the polymerization to εmall particle εize will have a εufficient major melting point or have a εufficiently low melt flow rate εuch that it iε non-meltable aε polymerized. In other caεes, the polymer εtabilizer may not be non-meltable aε polymerized but, prior to or during the melt processing in polyoxymethylene blend, it will crosslink, due to, for example, application of heat, to a sufficiently high molecular weight such that it has a low melt flow rate and is non-meltable at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend is melt processed. Whether the polymer εtabilizer will be non-meltable as polymerized or will become non-meltable after polymerization depends upon the nature of the particular monomer or comonomerε being polymerized.

In some cases, the polymer εtabilizer produced by the polymerization of the monomer or comonomerε will not be non-meltable aε polymerized and it will not become non-meltable subsequent to polymerization. This can be easily determined by measuring the melting point or melt flow rate of the εtabilizer after it has been compounded with polyoxymethylene. In εuch caεes, it iε deεirable to include at least one monomer that croεεlinkε the polymer εtabilizer either during polymerization or at a later time. Monomers that will cauεe croεεlinking during polymerization include polyfunctional, unsaturated monomers, εuch aε, for example, acrylates, methacrylates, acryla ides, and methacrylamides, and derivativeε thereof. Specifically preferred monomerε are ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and N,N'-methylenebiεacrylamide. Monomers that may cause crosεlinking after polymerization of the εtabilizer

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

polymer iε complete include, for example, glycidyl methacrylate, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and derivativeε thereof. The crosεlinking monomer εhould be added in an amount that iε εufficient to yield a polymer εtabilizer that iε non-meltable at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene iε melt proceεεed.

During the polymerization to small particle size in an organic media, with or without a crosβlinking monomer, it can be advantageous to have a diεperεing aid preεent. During the polymerization to εmall particle εize in an emulεion, it can be advantageouε to have an emulεifier preεent. Diεperεing aidε and the methods of preparing them are well known in the art. A description of the methods of making and choosing disperεing aidε iε included in Diεperεion Polymerization in Organic Media (by K. E. J. Barrett, New York: John Wiley & Sonε, 1975). Particularly preferred diεpersing aids include polyethylene glycol and its derivatives, methyl methacrylate copolymers, and poly(oxypropylene)-poly(oxyethylene) glycol block copolymers. Emulsifierε and the method of preparing them are well known in the art. Emulεion polymerizationε are diecuεεed in Emulεion Polymerization Theory and Practice (by D. C. Blackley, New York: John Wiley & Sonε, 1975) .

The dispersant or disperεant solution or the emulεifier is added to the polymerization reaction vesεel εimultaneouεly with the monomer and polymerization medium, and, where applicable, comonomer and crosslinking monomer. When a diεperεant or diεperεant εolution or emulεifier iε added to the εtabilizer, it iε advantageouε remove the diεperεant or diεperεant εolution or emulεifier from the εtabilizer polymer by waεhing the εtabilizer polymer.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

after it is prepared, with a solvent in which the diεperεant εolution or diεpersant or emulsifier is soluble but in which the polymer εtabilizer is insoluble. This iε particularly true if the diεpersant or disperεant εolution or emulεifier is known to destabilize polyoxymethylene. If the diεperεant or diεperεant εolution or emulsifier iε not known to destabilize polyoxymethylene in particular, it may be advantageous to leave it in the polymer εtabilizer aε it can act to reduce any agglomeration of particleε that may occur during the drying of the polymer εtabilizer.

The εmall number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer may alternatively be obtained εubεequent to the polymerization of the monomer or comonomerε, while the polymer εtabilizer iε εtill in the polymerization medium or iε in εolution. In εuch cases, the εmall number average particle εize of the εtabilizer may be obtained by adding a croεεlinking monomer to the polymer εtabilizer in the polymerization medium, after which the εtabilizer polymer becomes insoluble in the medium. Alternatively, the εmall number average particle εize of the εtabilizer may be obtained by adding a εolvent in which the εtabilizer polymer iε inεoluble to the polymer εtabilizer in the polymerization medium. Similarly, the polymer εtabilizer in the polymerization medium may be added to a εolvent in which the polymer εtabilizer iε inεoluble. Small number _. average particle εize can be obtained by other known meanε of εeparating the polymer from the polymerization medium. It can be advantageouε to uεe dispersing aids or e ulεifierε εuch aε thoεe previouεly described to separate the stabilizer polymer from the polymerization medium.

_S UBSTITUTE SHEET

Any method may be used to prepare the polymer εtabilizer provided that εuch method will yield a polymer εtabilizer having small particleε, with a number average εize leεε than 10 micronε, prior to melt processing with the polyoxymethylene blend.

Further, the εmall particleε εhould be non-meltable at the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend iε melt processed and εhould not coaleεce or agglomerate to εuch an extent that they are not readily diεperεible in the polyoxymethylene melt.

The number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer before it iε melt procesεed with the polyoxymethylene blend components can be measured by any means capable of determining number average particle εize.

The preferred means iε the MICROTRAC II SMALL PARTICLE ANALYZER (ANALYZER) , manufactured by Leedε & Northrup. A preferred model iε 158705/158708. By thiε method, the polymer εtabilizer iε added to a liquid, εuch as, for example, 2-propanol (usually about 0.1 grams of polymer εtabilizer in 15 ml. of liquid) , and εhaken by hand to diεperεe the polymer εtabilizer in the liquid. From thiε diεperεion, the number average particle εize for the polymer εtabilizer iε determined by the ANALYZER.

Specifically, the ANALYZER iε equipped with a εeventeen channel detector εyεtem that coverε a particle εize range of 0.17 to 60 micronε. The ANALYZER prints the percent of particle volume that has a diameter of less than the given detector channel. From the diameter and particle volume, the number average particle εize of the polymer stabilizer can be calculated. In this calculation, the particle diameter for a given detector channel is approximated

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

by the channel diameter. The number of particleε in each channel is calculated by the following formula:

N = (10000V%)/(0.5236d ³ /6) where N = number bf particleε in a given channel V% = volume of particleε in that channel d «= channel diameter By εum ing the number of particleε in all 17 channelε, the total number, of particles can be calculated. By multiplying the number of particles in a channel by 100, and dividing the result by the total number of particles, the percent of particles in each channel can be calculated. To calculate the total number percent having a diameter of less than that channel, a cumulative number percent is calculated by adding the number percent in all channels that have a diameter less than or equal to that particular channel. From thiε cumulative sum of number percentε, the median number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer can be calculated. The median number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer will be 10 microns or less for purposes of this invention.

With respect to the measuring of the number average particle size of the polymer εtabilizer, it iε noted that in εome cases, a high concentration of loose agglomerates may have occurred during the preparation of the polymer εtabilizer. In εuch caεes, more intensive mixing may be desired in order to break up the looεe agglomerateε. An example of a device capable of providing εuch intensive mixing is a "POLYTRON" (sold by Brinckman Instrumentε) .

The number average particle size of the polymer stabilizer after it has been melt procesεed with the componentε of the polyoxymethylene blend εhould be leεε than 10 micronε, preferably less than 5 microns, and most preferably lesε than 2 micronε. It

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

can be meaεured by any technique capable of meaεuring number average particle εize for particleε in a polymer. The preferred method of meaεuring the number average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer in the polyoxymethylene blend is by transmiεsion electron microεcopy.

It iε important that the polymer εtabilizer uεed in the blendε of the preεent invention be substantially free of compounds which deεtabilize polyoxymethylene resins.

In εtabilizing blendε based upon ester-capped or partially eεter-capped polyoxymethylene homopolymer, the polymer εtabilizer εhould be εubεtantially free of baεic materialε which can deεtabilize the polyoxymethylene. Baεic impuritieε εhould preferably be removed to levels of not more than 50 ppm and most preferably to not more than 10 pp . In εtabilizing blendε based upon polyoxymethylene copolymer or homopolymer that iε εubεtantially all ether-capped, higher concentrationε of baεic materialε can be tolerated. In addition, it εhould be underεtood that if the impurity iε only weakly baεic relatively higher amountε can be tolerated.

In εtabilizing blendε based upon either homopolymer and copolymer polyoxymethylene, acidic impurities in the polymer etabilizer εhould be minimized. Acidic impuritieε εhould preferably be removed to levelε of not more than 50 ppm and moεt preferably to not more than 10 ppm. Aε with baεic impuritieε, it εhould be understood that if the impurity is only weakly acidic, relatively higher amounts can be tolerated.

When acidic and/or basic impurities are present in the polymer stabilizer in amounts large enough to cause destabilization of the

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

polyoxymethylene blends, the polymer εtabilizer εhould be purified before it iε introduced into the blendε of the preεent invention. Polymer εtabilizerε uεed in the blendε of the preεent invention can be purified by waεhing with an appropriate liquid, εuch aε methanol and/or water. Polymer εtabilizerε prepared with diεperεantε or e ulεifierε that have deεtabilizing effectε because, for example, they are highly acidic or highly basic, can be purified by waεhing the εtabilizer with a εolvent in which the diεperεantε or emulεifierε are εoluble and in which the polymer εtabilizer iε inεoluble.

Component (e) Co-stabilizer Component The component (e) co-stabilizer component is selected from the group consiεting of conventional

"meltable" polyamide εtabilizers for polyoxymethylene, certain "meltable" hydroxy containing polymers or oligomerε, and microcryεtalline cellulose. The term "meltable" means the inverse of the the term "non-meltable", as described above. More specifically, it means that the co-stabilizer component has its "major melting point", as described above, below the temperature at which the polyoxymethylene blend iε melt proceεεed. The conventional meltable polyamide co-εtabilizerε uεeful herein are deεcribed in U.S. patentε 2,993,025; 4,640,949; 3,960,984; and 4,098,843, each of which iε incorporated herein by reference and described briefly above. The preferred conventional meltable nylon stabilizer is a terpolymer of polycaprolactam/polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexa ethylene sebacamide terpolymer, moεt preferably in the ratio of 43/34/23. Alternatively, it iε referred to aε a terpolymer of nylon 6/nylon 66/nylon 610.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

The certain meltable hydroxy containing polymer or oligomer co-εtabilizerε are diεcloεed in U.S. 4,766,168, incorporated herein by reference. More εpecifically, theεe co-εtabilizerε are polymerε/oligomerε containing hydroxy groupε wherein the atomε in the backbone of the polymer or oligomer to which the hydroxy groupε are attached, directly or indirectly, are εeparated from each other, on average, by not more than twenty chain atoms and provided further that the polymer or oligomer iε εubεtantially free of acidic materialε. The preferred hydroxy containing co-εtabilizer iε a polymer or oligomer of ethylene vinyl alcohol.

The microcryεtalline celluloεe co-εtabilizer uεeful herein iε described in U.S. patent 3,023,104, incorporated herein by reference. Microcrystalline cellulose is referred to therein aε "celluloεe cryεtallite aggregateε". Microcryεtalline celluloεe iε alεo deεcribed in "Hydrolyεiε and Crystallization of Celluloεe", Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 42, 502-507 (1950).

The microcrystalline cellulose uεeful herein will have an average particle εize no greater than 300 microns. The average particle εize iε the point at which 50% of the particleε are greater than average and 50% of the particleε are leεε than average. Average particle εize can be determined by εtandard techniqueε, εuch aε microεcopic inspection, gravitational sedimentation, sieve analysiε, and electron icroεcopy. The preferred method is gravitational sedimentation.

It is preferred that the average particle εize of the microcryεtalline celluloεe uεed herein be 100 micronε or lesε, more preferably, 50 micronε or

_S UBSTITUTE SHEET

leεε, even more preferably, 25 microns or leεε, and most preferably, 10 microns or lesε.

Other Componentε It εhould be underεtood that the compoεitionε of the preεent invention can include, in addition to the componentε of the polyoxymethylene blend, other ingredientε, modifierε, and additiveε aε are generally uεed in polyoxymethylene molding reεinε, including co-εtabilizerε other.than thoεe deεcribed above, anti-oxidantβ, especially areide-αontaining phenolic antioxidantε εuch as N,N'-hexamethylene bis(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyhydrocinnamide and mixtureε thereof, pigmentε, colorantε, UV εtabilizerε, hindered amine light εtabilizerε, toughening agentε, nucleating agentε, lubricantε, glaεε, talc, and fillerε. It εhould alεo be underεtood that εome pigmentε and colorantε can, themεelveε, adverεely affect the εtability of polyoxymethylene compoεitionε.

Blend Composition To achieve the improvements in thermal εtability, the polymer εtabilizer εhould be preεent in the blendε of the present invention in the amount of 0.05-3 weight percent, based on the weight of components (a), (b) , and (c) , preferably 0.15-1.5 weight percent and most preferably 0.2-1.0 weight percent. Higher amountε of the polymer εtabilizer can be used and the thermal stability of the polyoxymethylene blend may be improved; however, with increaεed loading of the polymer εtabilizer, the phyεical propertieε of the polyoxymethylene blend may decreaεe.

When the co-εtabilizer component iε present, it εhould be incorporated into the blend at the following weight percent rangeε, with εaid weight percent rangeε being baεed upon the total of

SUB TITUTE SHEET

-*- ^* components (a), (b) , and (c) only: 0.01 to 1.00 weight percent, preferably 0.01 to 0.50 weight percent, and more preferably, 0.05 to 0.30 -weight percent.

The weight percent range of componentε (a) , (b) , and (c) εhould be aε follows, with εaid weight percent rangeε being baεed upon the total weight of componentε (a), (b) , and (c) only: 40 to 98 weight percent component (a) polyoxymethylene, 1 to 40 weight percent component (b) thermoplaεtic polyurethane, and 1 to 59 weight percent component (c) amorphous thermoplaεtic polymer. Preferably, the weight percent range of componentε (a), (b) , and (c) iε aε follows: 45-90 weight percent component (a) polyoxymethylene, 5-30 weight percent component (b) thermoplaεtic polyurethane, and 5-50 weight percent component (c) amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer. Preferably, the weight percent range of componentε (a) , (b) , and (c) • iε aε followε: 50-90 weight percent component (a) polyoxymethylene, 5-20 weight percent component (b) thermoplaεtic polyurethane, and 5-45 weight percent component (c) amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer.

METHOD OF PREPARATION The compoεitionε of the preεent invention can be prepared by mixing the polymer stabilizer, which haε a number average particle εize of leεε than 10 microns and which is non-meltable, or can be made non-meltable during processing, with the polyoxymethylene polymer at a temperature above the melting point of the polyoxymethylene polymer using any intensive mixing device conventionally used in preparing thermoplastic polyoxymethylene compoεitionε, εuch as rubber mills, internal mixers εuch aε "Banbury" and "Brabender" mixerε, single or multiblade internal mixerε. with a cavity heated externally or by friction, "Ko-kneaders", ultibarrel mixerε such as

"Farrel Continuous Mixerε", injection molding machines, and extruders, both single εcrew and twin screw, both co-rotating and counter rotating, both intermeεhing and non-intermeεhing. These devices can be used alone or in combination with static mixers, mixing torpedoes and/or various devices to increase internal pressure and/or the intensity of mixing, εuch as valves, gate or screwε designed for thiε purpoεe. Extruderε are preferred. Of course, such mixing should be conducted at a temperature below which significant degradation of the polyoxymethylene will occur. The polymer εtabilizer in the compoεition after melt processing will have a number average particle size less than 10 microns. Shaped articles can be made from the compositions of the present invention using any of several common methods, including compresεion molding, injection molding, extrusion molding, blow molding, rotational molding, melt εpinning, and thermoforming. Injection molding is preferred. Examples of shaped articles include sheet, profiles, rod stock, film, filaments, fibers, strapping, tape tubing, and pipe. Such shaped articles can be post treated by orientation, stretching, coating, annealing, painting, laminating, and plating. Such shaped articles and scrap therefrom can be ground and remolded. Procesεing conditionε uεed in the preparation of the co poεitions of the present invention and shaped articles made therefrom include melt temperatures of about 170-260'C, preferably

185-240'C, most preferably 200-230'C. When injection molding the compositions of the present invention, the mold temperature will generally be 10-120*C, preferably 10-100*C, and most preferably about 50-90*C.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

EXAMPLES In the following examples, there are shown specific embodiments of the present invention, along with comparative exampleε. It iε εhown that the blends stabilized with the polymer stabilizer described herein are characterized as having better thermal εtability than do the εame blendε εtabilized with conventional polyoxymethylene εtabilizerε. It iε further εhown that blendε εtabilized with a mixed εtabilizer εyεtem containing the polymer εtabilizer described herein and either a polyamide εtabilizer or a hydroxy containing εtabilizer have better melt proceεεing εtability than blends εtabilizer with one component of the εtabilizer system. The blends stabilized with the polymer εtabilizer deεcribed herein are alεo εhown to have at leaεt an acceptable balance of physical properties.

COMPONENTS OF THE EXAMPLES The components uεed in the blendε of the following examples were aε followε:

Polyoxymethylene fPOMi Polymer "POM-A" waε an acetate end-capped homopolymer having a number average molecular weight of about 35,000. "POM-B" waε a commercially available polyoxymethylene copolymer having a melt flow index of about 9.0 at 190 ^* C under a load of 2160 g. It waε prepared from the cationic polymerization of trioxane and ethylene oxide uεing bortrifluoride aε a catalyεt.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Stabj serε Stabilizer "A" waε the non-meltable polymer εtabilizer, containing formaldehyde reactive nitrogen groupε, of the present invention. It waε prepared by adding a εolution of 14.3 kg of acrylamide and 145.15 grams of 1,4-butanediol diacrylate to a refluxing solution of 1.44 kg of polyethylene glycol having a molecular weight of about 8000 in 48.06 kg of methanol (approximately 64*C) over a period of about two hours. Throughout thiε addition, a total of 195.04 gramε of tert-butylperoxypivylate polymerization initiator waε portionwiεe added. The reεulting reaction suspenεion waε cooled and filtered. The reεulting white εolid was waεhed with methanol and dried in a vacuum oven (6.75X1&4 Pa) at 70*C for 1 day and at 100'C for 1 day.

Co-Stabilizer *B" waε a 43/34/23 polycaprolactum/polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexamethylene εebacamide terpolymer. Thiε iε alεo known as a 43/34/23 terpolymer of nylon 6, nylon 66, and nylon 610, respectively. It had a melting point, measured in accordance with ASTM D796, between 148-160*C.

Co-Stabilizer "C" was a 29/79 copolymer of ethylene and vinyl alcohol prepared in accordance with U.S. 4,766,168. It had a melting point, measrued in accordance with ASTM D796, of about 191*C.

Co-Stabilizer *D" waε nylon 66 diεperεed in an ethylene/methacrylate copolymer, prepared aε deεcribed in U.S. 4,098,843. Specifically, it waε nylon 66 (33.5%) in an 85/15 ethylene/methacrylate copolymer (66.5%) partially crosslinked by zinc εaltε. The percent of neutralization with the zinc εaltε iε about 58%. It had a melt flow rate of 0.7 g/lOmin, aε measured by ASTM D-1238, and a melting point of 88 ^* C,

42 as measured by Differential Thermal Analyεiε (ASTM D3 18, heating rate of lO'C/minute.

Thermoplastic Polyurethane fTPU) The thermoplastic polyurethane used in the blends of the exampleε below had an inherent viεcosity of 1.33, a soft segment glaεε tranεition temperature (Tg) of -35"C, and was comprised of 37% adipic acid, 39% butanediol, and 24% ,4'-methylene bisphenyl iεocyanate. Inherent viεcosity was measured by ASTM D-2857 with a "Schott* automatic viscometer at 0.1% polyurethane in dimethyl formamide at 30*C. The Tg waε determined uεing a Du Pont Model 981 Dynamic Mechanical Analyεiε Cell attached to a Model 990 DTA inεtrument. The cell waε modified to uεe liquid nitrogen aε the coolant and to allow the uεe of a 3.2 cm (1.25 inch) gap holding the specimen. The oscillation amplitude was set at 0.2 mm. A heating rate of 2.5'C/min waε uεed from -170*C to 0* to 0'C depending on the εignal amplitude. Readings were taken every l'C increment. The storage and loss moduli were plotted and the major losε oduluε peak waε defined aε the εoft εegment glaεs tranεition temperature.

Amorphous Thermoplaεtic Polvmer Unleεε otherwiεe εpecified, the melt viεcosity data, in Pascal εecondε, on the amorphouε thermoplastic polymer component uεed in the blendε of the exampleε below waε obtained at 220*C, at εhear rateε of 100 1/εec and 1000 1/εec. The viεcosity data for the individual amorphous thermoplaεtic polymerε uεed in the examples is reported firstly for a εhear rate of 100 1/εec and εecondly for a shear rate of 1000 1/sec. The individual araorphouε thermoplaεtic polymeric components uεed in the exampleε are deεcribed aε followε:

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

SAN-A was a εtyrene acrylonitrile copolymer having a melt viεcoεity of 934 and 241, reεpectively, and consisting of 30% acrylonitrile, 70% styrene.

SAN-B was a εtyrene acrylonitrile copolymer having a melt viεcoεity of 1713 and 329, reεpectively, and conεiεting of 24% acrylonitrile, 76% styrene.

AES was an acrylonitrile-ethylene-propylene- εtyrene reεin having a melt viεcoεity of 1841 and 363, reεpectively, and consiεting of 51% styrene, 21% acrylonitrile, and 28% ethylene propylene rubber.

ABS waε an acrylonitrile-butadiene-εtyrene reεin having a melt viεcoεity of 1081 and 223, reεpectively, and consisting of 77% εtyrene, 18% acrylonitrile, and 5% butadiene. PC-A was a polycarbonate of bisphenol A having a melt viεcoεity of 218 Paεcal seconds, measured at a shear rate of 250 sec""l at 280*C and 187 Pascal εecondε, meaεured at a εhear rate of 1000 εec~l at 280'C. Antioxidantε

Antioxidant "A" waε 2,2-methylene-biε-(4- methyl-6-tert-butyl-phenol) .

Antioxidant "B" waε N,N'-hexamethylene-biε- 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenol) proprionate. Antioxidant "C" was a triethyleneglycol-bis-

3(tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl) proprionate. PREPARATION OF THE BLENDS Methofl A

The components of the blendε were melt compounded on a 28 mm Werner ^~ Pfleiderer bilobal extruder, uεing a εcrew deεign containing two working εectionε with five kneading elementε (70 m total) , and two reverεe elementε (24 mm total) . All componentε were supplied from the main feeder at the rear of the extruder. The extruder was operated at

SHEET

about 150 rpm with 15-25 pounds per hour throughput. The temperature of the melt coming out of the die ranged from 210"C to 230*C. Method B The componentε of the blend were melt compounded in two steps. In the first step, the polyoxymethylene component, the thermal stabilizer component(ε) , and the antioxidant(ε) were compounded on a 2 1/2" εterling εcrew extruder with a εcrew εpeed of 60 rpm. The temperature of the melt exiting the extruder waε between 225-240*C. The reεultant polyoxymethylene product waε pelletized. In the εecond εtep, the pelletized product waε melt compounded with the thermoplaεtic polyurethane component and the amorphouε thermoplaεtic polymer componentε of the blend under the same conditionε aε deεcribed in Method A. above. Method C

The componentε of the blend were melt compounded on a 2" εterling εingle εcrew extruder, using a εingle stage εcrew deεign with a metering ratio of 2.5/1.0 and a barrier εection 8* long and 6" from the front of the εcrew. All componentε were εupplied from the rear εide of the εcrew. The temperature of the melt coming out of the valve die ranged from 225'C to 240*C. The extruder waε operated at 60-80 rpm with 25-45 pounds per hour throughput. Method D

The componentε of the blend were melt compounded on a 30 mm Werner & Pfleiderer bilobal extruder with/without a εeed feeder. The εcrew contained two kneading εectionε (84 mm total) and two reverεe εectionε (20 mm total) . The temperature of the melt exiting the die ranged from 200*C to 210*C and the throughput waε 15-25 pounds per hour. The

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

extruder was operated at 140-160 rpm. The componentε of the blend were added to the extruder via the rear side of the screw and εide feeder aε described in TABLE I below.

ΪΔELΪ I

Method Rear Feed Side Feed Feed No. Components . pmppneηtp patio

D.l POM, εtabilizer(ε) , TPU, amorphouε 1:1 antioxidant(ε) reεin

D.2 POM, stabilizer(ε) , amorphous 6:4 TPU, antioxidant(ε) reεin

D.3 All

In TABLE I. the feed ratio is the ratio of rear feed:side feed. Method E

The components of the blend were melt compounded on a 57 mm Werner and Pfleiderer bilobal extruder. The polyoxymethylene polymer and εtabilizer components were supplied from the rear of the extruder while the thermoplastic polyurethane and amorphous thermoplastic polymer components were added via a side feeder. The ratio of rear feed:εide feed was 45:55. The εcrew had four kneading blockε and four reverεe εections. The temperature of the melt coming out of the die was about 24 *C. The extruder was operated at

100 rpm.

TESTING OF THE BLENDS

The thermal εtability of the polyoxymethylene blendε of the exampleε waε determined uεing a thermally evolved formaldehyde (TEF) teεt procedure. A weighed εample of polyoxymethylene blend was placed in a tube and the tube waε fitted with a cap for introduction of nitrogen to the teεt εample for removal of any evolved gaseε from the apparatuε while maintaining the εample in an oxygen-free

environment. The tube that contained the εample was heated at either 250*C or 259 ^* C in a silicon oil bath. The nitrogen and any evolved gaseε tranεported thereby were bubbled through 75 ml of a 40 g/liter εodium sulfite in water εolution. Any evolved formaldehyde reactε with the εodium εulfite to liberate sodium hydroxide. The εodium hydroxide waε continuouεly neutralized with εtaήdard 0.1 N HCl. The reεultε were obtained aε a chart of ml of titer verεuε teεt time. The percent evolved formaldehyde waε calculated by the formula

where V = the volume of titer in milliliterε

N = the normality of the titer, and

SW = the εample weight in gramε. The factor "0.03" iε the milliequivalent weight of formaldehyde in g/milliequivalent. Thermally evolved formaldehyde reεults are reported after 15 minutes and 30 minutes for the blend.

Also, in some inεtanceε, the percent thermally evolved formaldehyde reεulting only from the polyoxymethylene component of the blend iε reported after 30

where V i i i i i N = the normality of the titer SW = the εample weight in gramε WP =■ the weight percent of polyoxymethylene in the εample The total percent weight loεε of the blend after 30 minutes of testing by the TEF procedure waε alεo determined in εome inεtanceε. Total percent

SUBST UTE SHEET

weight loss was determined by the following equation:

(W2 - W3i x 100 Wl where Wl •=- original -sample weight (in grams) W2 = original εample weight (in grams) + glass tube weight (in gramε) W3 «= weight of εample (in grams) + glass tube weight after 30 minutes of testing (in grams) In some caseε, the phyεical propertieε of the εtabilized blends were tested. Specifically, the phyεical propertieε that were teεted were aε follows: mold εhrinkage, εtrength (i.e., tenεile) , elongation, and toughneεε (i.e., notched Izod) .

Mold εhrinkage was determined on bars molded from the melt-compounded stabilized blends. Unlesε otherwiεe εpecified, the pelletε of the melt compounded εtabilized blend were loaded into a 6 ounce C Molding Machine using cylinder temperature settingε of about 200*C, a mold temperature set to 60*C, a back presεure of 50 psi, a εcrew εpeed of 60 rpm, a cycle of 15 εecondε injection/15 εecondε hold, mold pressure about 6 kpsi, and a general purpose εcrew. The melted blend waε injection molded into εtandard 12.7 cm X 1.27 cm X 0.32 cm (5 in X 1/2 in X 1/8) teεt barε that are uεed in meaεuring "Izod" toughneεε (according to ASTM-0256, Method A). The length of the mold waε meaεured. The εample blend waε allowed to εtand in the teεt bar mold at leaεt 2 dayε in an air conditioned room, after which time the molded εample bar waε removed and itε length waε meaεured. Mold εhrinkage was determined by the following formula:

Mold ** (mold length-molded sample bar length) x(100) Shrinkage (mold length)

The value reported is the average value obtained for three test barε.

STITUTE SHEET

Strength (i.e., tenεile) waε determined in accordance with ASTM 638 on three molded εample barε and the average value iε reported. Sampleε were allowed to εtand at leaεt two dayε in an air conditioned room after molding and prior to teεting. Teεting waε done at 23'C (50% RH) .

Elongation*waε meaεured in accordance with ASTM-D638 at 2"/min. Sampleε were allowed to εtand at least two days in an air conditioned room after molding and prior to testing. Testing was done at

23*C (50% RH) . The value reported iε the average of the value obtained on three teεt barε.

Toughneεs, reported as "Izod", was measured according to ASTM D-256, Method A. Sampleε were notched uεing a εingle toothed cutting wheel on a TMI Notching Cutter Model 43-15 with a cutter εpeed εetting of 10.0 and a feed speed setting of 6.0. The samples were allowed to εtand at leaεt two dayε in an air conditioned room after molding prior to teεting. Teεting waε done at 23'C (50% RH) . Sample barε were prepared aε for the mold εhrinkage test, i.e., from a 12.7 cm X 1.27 cm X 0.32 cm (5 in X 1/2 X 1.8 in) injection molded bar. The sample bar was cut in half with a notch in each half cut approximately 3.1 cm (1 1/4 in) from each end. Six εampleε of each compoεition were teεted and the average value waε reported.

Average particle size of the polymer stabilizer in the blend waε determined by tranεmiεεion electron microscopy (TEM) . TEM sampleε were prepared by crosε-εectional microtoming of molded flexural barε (1/8 inch) of the melt proceεεed blend, said barε being prepared as described for the mold εhrinkage tests. The TEM εampleε were microtomed εo that croεε sectional views perpendicular to the direction of flow

STITUTE SHEET

of the blend would be cut from the flexural bar. Uεing εtandard -90"C cryo-ultramicrotomy techniqueε, 90-120 nanometer εectionε of each εample were microto ed. The εectionε were mounted on copper TEM gridε and expoεed to ruthenium tetroxide vaporε for εtaining. The εtained εections were examined uεing a Zeiεε EM10CR tranεmiεεion electron microεcope. Imageε were recorded at nominal magnifications of lOOOx, 2520x, and 5000x. Magnification calibrations performed on an annual basis using a commercially available grating replica were combined to give the final image magnification, which included 4640x, 11800x, and 23000x. To determine the average particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer in the blend, minimum and maximum εize particles were εelected in the TEM photograph (X4640 AND X11800) and the diameter of the particle waε meaεured with a ruler. Any agglomerated particles were treated as one particle. The number average particle εize of the polymer stabilizer in the blend was determined by averaging the values obtained for measurement of at least 15 particles. Reported in the Examples below is the range of particle sizes of the polymer εtabilizer A obεerved in a TEM photograph of a melt compounded blend. In all caεeε in the Exampleε below where the particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer in the blend was determined, the polymer stabilizer was observed as white round particles, indicating that said εtabilizer did not melt during the extruεion and molding proceεεeε.

EXAMPLES 1-5

The blend componentε and method of preparation of Exampleε 1-5, along with control exampleε C1-C13 are detailed in TABLE IIA _f below. Thermal εtability data for each blend iε reported in

TABLE II . below, and physical property data for each blend, where available, iε reported in TABLE IIB. below. The polyoxymethylene uεed in the blends of TABLES IIA and IIB was polyoxymethylene A. Examples C1-C4 and Example 1.1 show the effect of variouε stabilizers on the thermal stability of a POM/TPU blend. Stabilizers A-D worked equally well in εtabilizing the POM/TPU blend. Example 1.1 showed, however, that a εtabilizer syεtem consisting of the polymer stabilizer A and the nylon εtabilizer B acted to improve the εtability of the POM/TPU blend to a greater extent than did polymer εtabilizer A alone or nylon stabilizer B alone. Samples of the C4 blend were taken for TEM analyεiε, as deεcribed above. The particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer A in the C4 blend ranged from 0.6-1.4 micronε.

Exampleε C5-C7 and 2.1-2.2 εhow the effect, of the polymer εtabilizer A and conventional εtabilizerε on the thermal εtability of POM/TPU/PC blendε. Samples of the Example 2.1 blend were taken for TEM analyεiε, as described above. The particle size of the polymer εtabilizer A in Example blend 2.1 ranged from 0.6-1.8 micronε. The polymer stabilizer A provided significantly better thermal stability at 15 minutes of testing to the POM/TPU/PC blend than did the other conventional thermal stabilizerε. Alεo, a mixed εtabilizer system consisting of polymer stabilizer A and nylon εtabilizer B imparted better thermal stability to the POM/TPU/PC blend than did either εtabilizer by itεelf.

In Examples C8-C9 and 3.1-3.2, stabilized POM/TPU/ABS blends were tested. In Exampleε C10-C12 and 4.1-4.3, POM/TPU/AES blendε were teεted. In both caεes, the polymer stabilizer A imparted significantly better thermal εtability to the blendε than did the

other conventional εtabilizerε. Further, in both caεes, a mixed εtabilizer εyεtem conεiεting of polymer εtabilizer A and nylon εtabilizer B imparted better thermal εtability.to the blend than did either εtabilizer alone. Samples were taken from the blends of Example 3.2, Example 4.1, and Example 4.3 for TEM analyεiε, aε deεcribed above. The particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer. A in Example 3.2 ranged from 0.6-1.3 microns. The particle εize of the polymer εtabilizer A in Example 4.1 ranged from 0.8-1.2 and in Example 4.3 it ranged from 0.8-1.6.

In Exampleε C13 and 5.1-5.2, stabilized POM/TPU./SAN blends were tested. Results showed the weight loεε experienced by the blend during teεting waε leεs when polymer stabilizer A was uεed then when, the εtabilizer of choice waε conventional nylon εtabilizer B.

The phyεical property data preεented in TABLE IIB. below, εhowε that the blendε stabilized with polymer stabilizer A have a useful balance of physical properties.

nm -=- no measure

Eg. Blend type No.

Cl POM-A/TPU C2 POM-A/TPU C3 POM- A/ PU C4 POM-A/TPU 1.1 POM-A/TPU O C5 POM-A/TPU/ PC

C6 POM-A/TPU/ PC

C7 POM-A/TPU/PC

2.1 POM-A/TPU/PC

2.2 POM-A/TPU/PC

C8 POM-A/TPU/ABS C9 POM-A/TPU/ABS 3.1 POM-A/TPU/ABS 3.2 POM-A/TPU/ABS

CIO POM-A/TPU/AES Cll POM-A/TPU/AES C12 POM-A/TPU/AES 4.1 POM-A/TPU/AES 4.2 POM-A/TPU/AES 4.3 POM-A/TPU/AES

C13 POM-A/TPU/SAN 5.1 POM-A/TPU/SAN 5.2 POM-A/TPU/SAN

nm = not measured

EXAMPLES 6-9

The components and the method used in preparing the blends of examples 6-9, along with examples C14-C17, are deεcribed in TABLE III, below. Thermal εtability reεultε for theεe blends are alεo reported in TABLE III. In each caεe, the polyoxymethylene uεed waε polyoxymethylene A.

In each caεe, the thermal εtability of a blend containing the polymer εtabilizer A waε εignificantly improved over that of the same blend containing conventional nylon εtabilizer B in place of the polymer stabilizer A.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

TABLE III

Thermally Evolved CH Q (%) g 25QgC

nm - not measured

EXAMPLE 1Q

Example 10 relateε to blendε of POM, TPU, and AES. The blends, along with the method by which each waε prepared, are deεcribed in TABLE IV. below. In each caεe, the polyoxymethylene uεed waε polyoxymethylene A.

In each case, the blend containing a stabilizer εyεtem conεiεting of polymer εtabilizer A and conventional nylon εtabilizer B had εignificantly better thermal stability than did blends containing as a εtabilizer only the conventional nylon εtabilizer B.

TABLE IV

Thermally Evolved CH£θ (%) e 25Q ^O .C

Eg. Wt. % Wt. % 15 min 30 min No. Blend Type % Ratios Method Stabilizer Antioxidant (blend) (blend)

X

EXAMPLE 11

In this example, a 45/15/40 POM-A/TPU/SAN-B blend waε prepared by Method E. The blend contained aε a εtabilizer εyεtem 0.27 weight percent polymer εtabilizer A-and 0.14 weight percent conventional nylon εtabilizer B. No antioxidant waε added to the blend. The TEF reεultε (at 250*C) on the blend were aε follows: 0.11 after 15 minutes of testing and 0.29 after 30 minutes of teεting. The weight loss of the blend after 30 minuteε of testing by the TEF procedure was 1.81. These results show that the blend containing the εtabilizer εyεtem consisting of polymer εtabilizer A and the conventional nylon stabilizer was thermally stable in the absence of an antioxidant. EXAMPLE 12

Example 12 and C20 relate to blends of POM-B (a polyoxymethylene copolymer), TPU, and ABS. The blends, and the method by which they were prepared, are described in TABLE V _f below. The thermal εtability of the blend waε improved when polymer εtabilizer A waε incorporated into the blend and the weight loεε experienced by the blend was εignificantly reduced when polymer εtabilizer A was added to the blend.

I